Caversham vs Lockridge, WA suburb comparison

Caversham for retirees and investment; Lockridge for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CavershamLockridge

Overall score

Caversham

61.2/100

Lockridge

40.9/100

Crime rate

Caversham

1215.9 / 1k

Lockridge

2684.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caversham

87

Lockridge

33

Population

Caversham

7,419

Lockridge

3,322

Metric leadCaversham 9Lockridge 1across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCavershamLockridge
Overall score61.2/10040.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10032.4/100
Crime rate1215.9 / 1k2684.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Parks & reserves151
Public transport stops3125
Walkability61.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities8733
Population7,4193,322
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Caversham reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Lockridge is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Lockridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Caversham keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Caversham is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Lockridge answers with schools and education options. Caversham generally means more sought-after housing, while Lockridge leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Caversham, while Lockridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons