Caversham vs Lockridge, WA Suburb Comparison

Caversham for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CavershamLockridge

Overall score

Caversham

49.4/100

Lockridge

33.7/100

Crime rate

Caversham

44.4 / 1k

Lockridge

44.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caversham

191

Lockridge

46

Population

Caversham

7,419

Lockridge

3,322

Metric leadCaversham 7Lockridge 32 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCavershamLockridge
Overall score49.4/10033.7/100
Housing (desirability)48.9/10052.3/100
Crime rate44.4 / 1k44.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves151
Public transport stops3125
Walkability61.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities19146
Green cover6.7%13.3%
Population7,4193,322
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Caversham reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Lockridge is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Lockridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Caversham keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Caversham is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Lockridge answers with schools and education options.

Retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Caversham the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lockridge.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons