Caversham vs South Guildford, WA Suburb Comparison

Caversham for families and investment; South Guildford for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CavershamSouth Guildford

Overall score

Caversham

49.4/100

South Guildford

49.3/100

Crime rate

Caversham

43.1 / 1k

South Guildford

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caversham

191

South Guildford

81

Population

Caversham

7,419

South Guildford

3,781

Metric leadCaversham 6South Guildford 42 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCavershamSouth Guildford
Overall score49.4/10049.3/100
Housing (desirability)48.9/10047.6/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves153
Public transport stops3140
Walkability61.0/10045.0/100
Nearby amenities19181
Green cover6.7%27.0%
Population7,4193,781
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Caversham is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while South Guildford is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Caversham is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability; South Guildford answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Caversham suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas South Guildford is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons