Cecil Hills vs Green Valley, NSW suburb comparison

Cecil Hills for retirees and families; Green Valley for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cecil HillsGreen Valley

Overall score

Cecil Hills

61.1/100

Green Valley

57.6/100

Crime rate

Cecil Hills

20.9 / 1k

Green Valley

72.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cecil Hills

89

Green Valley

107

Population

Cecil Hills

6,906

Green Valley

12,919

Metric leadCecil Hills 6Green Valley 5across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCecil HillsGreen Valley
Overall score61.1/10057.6/100
Housing (desirability)56.7/10056.4/100
Crime rate20.9 / 1k72.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools411
Parks & reserves1312
Public transport stops63115
Walkability57.0/10059.0/100
Nearby amenities89107
Planning activity39
Population6,90612,919
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/102/10

Comparison summary

Cecil Hills reads as a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks; Green Valley is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Cecil Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Green Valley keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Cecil Hills pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Green Valley is the better pick for schools and education options and public transport access. Cecil Hills generally means more sought-after housing, while Green Valley leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Cecil Hills suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Green Valley is the stronger match for investors and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons

Cecil Hills vs Green Valley, NSW suburb… | Suburb Guide