Overall score
Cecil Hills
61.1/100
Hinchinbrook
47.5/100
Cecil Hills for retirees and families; Hinchinbrook for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cecil Hills
61.1/100
Hinchinbrook
47.5/100
Crime rate
Cecil Hills
20.9 / 1k
Hinchinbrook
72.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cecil Hills
89
Hinchinbrook
87
Population
Cecil Hills
6,906
Hinchinbrook
11,521
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cecil Hills | Hinchinbrook |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.1/100 | 47.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.7/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 20.9 / 1k | 72.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 63 | 80 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 87 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 10 |
| Population | 6,906 | 11,521 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 3/10 |
Cecil Hills reads as a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks; Hinchinbrook is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cecil Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hinchinbrook keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Cecil Hills is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hinchinbrook answers with schools and education options and public transport access. Cecil Hills generally means more sought-after housing, while Hinchinbrook leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees and families may find Cecil Hills the better fit, while investors and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hinchinbrook.