Cecil Hills vs Hinchinbrook, NSW suburb comparison

Cecil Hills for retirees and families; Hinchinbrook for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cecil HillsHinchinbrook

Overall score

Cecil Hills

61.1/100

Hinchinbrook

47.5/100

Crime rate

Cecil Hills

20.9 / 1k

Hinchinbrook

72.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cecil Hills

89

Hinchinbrook

87

Population

Cecil Hills

6,906

Hinchinbrook

11,521

Metric leadCecil Hills 8Hinchinbrook 3across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCecil HillsHinchinbrook
Overall score61.1/10047.5/100
Housing (desirability)56.7/10056.4/100
Crime rate20.9 / 1k72.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools412
Parks & reserves139
Public transport stops6380
Walkability57.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities8987
Planning activity310
Population6,90611,521
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/103/10

Comparison summary

Cecil Hills reads as a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks; Hinchinbrook is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cecil Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hinchinbrook keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Cecil Hills is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hinchinbrook answers with schools and education options and public transport access. Cecil Hills generally means more sought-after housing, while Hinchinbrook leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and families may find Cecil Hills the better fit, while investors and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hinchinbrook.

Related comparisons