Champion Lakes vs Mount Nasura, WA Suburb Comparison

Champion Lakes for families and value; Mount Nasura for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Champion LakesMount Nasura

Overall score

Champion Lakes

31.3/100

Mount Nasura

40.2/100

Crime rate

Champion Lakes

60.1 / 1k

Mount Nasura

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Champion Lakes

74

Mount Nasura

123

Population

Champion Lakes

1,355

Mount Nasura

2,997

Metric leadChampion Lakes 1Mount Nasura 74 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChampion LakesMount Nasura
Overall score31.3/10040.2/100
Housing (desirability)63.3/10054.1/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools25
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves33
Public transport stops112
Walkability1.5/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities74123
Green cover1.8%11.8%
Population1,3552,997
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/106/10

Comparison summary

Champion Lakes is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Champion Lakes keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Champion Lakes pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Mount Nasura is the better pick for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Champion Lakes the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Nasura.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons