Overall score
Champion Lakes
35.2/100
Mount Nasura
37.4/100
Champion Lakes for investment and value; Mount Nasura for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Champion Lakes
35.2/100
Mount Nasura
37.4/100
Crime rate
Champion Lakes
8697.7 / 1k
Mount Nasura
4100.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Champion Lakes
45
Mount Nasura
70
Population
Champion Lakes
1,355
Mount Nasura
2,997
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Champion Lakes | Mount Nasura |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.2/100 | 37.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 43.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 8697.7 / 1k | 4100.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 12 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 45 | 70 |
| Population | 1,355 | 2,997 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 6/10 |
Champion Lakes is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Champion Lakes keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Champion Lakes pulls ahead on housing affordability and overall desirability, whereas Mount Nasura is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Champion Lakes, while Mount Nasura remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.