Overall score
Champion Lakes
31.3/100
Mount Nasura
40.2/100
Champion Lakes for families and value; Mount Nasura for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Champion Lakes
31.3/100
Mount Nasura
40.2/100
Crime rate
Champion Lakes
60.1 / 1k
Mount Nasura
60.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Champion Lakes
74
Mount Nasura
123
Population
Champion Lakes
1,355
Mount Nasura
2,997
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Champion Lakes | Mount Nasura |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 31.3/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.3/100 | 54.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.1 / 1k | 60.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 12 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 74 | 123 |
| Green cover | 1.8% | 11.8% |
| Population | 1,355 | 2,997 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 6/10 |
Champion Lakes is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Champion Lakes keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Champion Lakes pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Mount Nasura is the better pick for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Champion Lakes the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Nasura.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.