Camillo vs Mount Nasura, WA Suburb Comparison

Camillo for retirees; Mount Nasura for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CamilloMount Nasura

Overall score

Camillo

36.9/100

Mount Nasura

40.2/100

Crime rate

Camillo

61.8 / 1k

Mount Nasura

61.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Camillo

86

Mount Nasura

123

Population

Camillo

4,442

Mount Nasura

2,997

Metric leadCamillo 5Mount Nasura 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCamilloMount Nasura
Overall score36.9/10040.2/100
Housing (desirability)40.8/10054.1/100
Crime rate61.8 / 1k61.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools75
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves73
Public transport stops3312
Walkability59.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities86123
Green cover8.4%11.8%
Population4,4422,997
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Camillo is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Camillo keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Camillo pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Mount Nasura is the better pick for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Choose Camillo if you are weighing families; lean toward Mount Nasura for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons