Overall score
Camillo
43.9/100
Mount Nasura
37.4/100
Camillo for families; Mount Nasura for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Camillo
43.9/100
Mount Nasura
37.4/100
Crime rate
Camillo
2636.5 / 1k
Mount Nasura
4100.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Camillo
46
Mount Nasura
70
Population
Camillo
4,442
Mount Nasura
2,997
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Camillo | Mount Nasura |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.9/100 | 37.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 19.9/100 | 43.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 2636.5 / 1k | 4100.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 12 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 70 |
| Population | 4,442 | 2,997 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Camillo is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Camillo keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Camillo pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Mount Nasura is the better pick for housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Camillo sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Nasura.
Choose Camillo if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mount Nasura for investors and value-focused buyers.