Overall score
Camillo
36.9/100
Kelmscott
55.1/100
Camillo for families and schools; Kelmscott for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Camillo
36.9/100
Kelmscott
55.1/100
Crime rate
Camillo
60.1 / 1k
Kelmscott
60.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Camillo
86
Kelmscott
297
Population
Camillo
4,442
Kelmscott
10,575
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Camillo | Kelmscott |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.9/100 | 55.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.8/100 | 50.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.1 / 1k | 60.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 97 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 94.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 86 | 297 |
| Green cover | 8.4% | 32.7% |
| Population | 4,442 | 10,575 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Camillo is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Kelmscott is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Camillo pulls ahead on schools and education options, whereas Kelmscott is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kelmscott, while Camillo remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.