Camillo vs Kelmscott, WA Suburb Comparison

Camillo for families and schools; Kelmscott for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CamilloKelmscott

Overall score

Camillo

36.9/100

Kelmscott

55.1/100

Crime rate

Camillo

60.1 / 1k

Kelmscott

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Camillo

86

Kelmscott

297

Population

Camillo

4,442

Kelmscott

10,575

Metric leadCamillo 1Kelmscott 92 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCamilloKelmscott
Overall score36.9/10055.1/100
Housing (desirability)40.8/10050.3/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools75
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves715
Public transport stops3397
Walkability59.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities86297
Green cover8.4%32.7%
Population4,44210,575
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Camillo is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Kelmscott is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Camillo pulls ahead on schools and education options, whereas Kelmscott is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kelmscott, while Camillo remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons