Kelmscott vs Mount Nasura, WA suburb comparison

Kelmscott for families and schools; Mount Nasura for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KelmscottMount Nasura

Overall score

Kelmscott

55.1/100

Mount Nasura

37.4/100

Crime rate

Kelmscott

1179.4 / 1k

Mount Nasura

4100.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kelmscott

127

Mount Nasura

70

Population

Kelmscott

10,575

Mount Nasura

2,997

Metric leadKelmscott 7Mount Nasura 21 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKelmscottMount Nasura
Overall score55.1/10037.4/100
Housing (desirability)27.6/10043.7/100
Crime rate1179.4 / 1k4100.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Parks & reserves153
Public transport stops9712
Walkability63.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities12770
Population10,5752,997
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/106/10

Comparison summary

Kelmscott reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Kelmscott keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Kelmscott pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Mount Nasura is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Kelmscott sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Nasura.

Kelmscott suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Mount Nasura is the stronger match for investors.

Related comparisons