Overall score
Kelmscott
55.1/100
Mount Nasura
37.4/100
Kelmscott for families and schools; Mount Nasura for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kelmscott
55.1/100
Mount Nasura
37.4/100
Crime rate
Kelmscott
1179.4 / 1k
Mount Nasura
4100.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kelmscott
127
Mount Nasura
70
Population
Kelmscott
10,575
Mount Nasura
2,997
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kelmscott | Mount Nasura |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.1/100 | 37.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 27.6/100 | 43.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 1179.4 / 1k | 4100.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 15 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 97 | 12 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 18.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 127 | 70 |
| Population | 10,575 | 2,997 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 6/10 |
Kelmscott reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Kelmscott keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Kelmscott pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Mount Nasura is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Kelmscott sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Nasura.
Kelmscott suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Mount Nasura is the stronger match for investors.