Kelmscott vs Mount Nasura, WA Suburb Comparison

Kelmscott for retirees and investment; Mount Nasura for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KelmscottMount Nasura

Overall score

Kelmscott

55.1/100

Mount Nasura

40.2/100

Crime rate

Kelmscott

60.1 / 1k

Mount Nasura

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kelmscott

297

Mount Nasura

123

Population

Kelmscott

10,575

Mount Nasura

2,997

Metric leadKelmscott 7Mount Nasura 23 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKelmscottMount Nasura
Overall score55.1/10040.2/100
Housing (desirability)50.3/10054.1/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves153
Public transport stops9712
Walkability94.0/10018.0/100
Nearby amenities297123
Green cover32.7%11.8%
Population10,5752,997
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/106/10

Comparison summary

Kelmscott reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Kelmscott keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Kelmscott pulls ahead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Mount Nasura is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Kelmscott suits families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Mount Nasura is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons