Overall score
Champion Lakes
35.2/100
Kelmscott
55.1/100
Champion Lakes for investment and value; Kelmscott for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Champion Lakes
35.2/100
Kelmscott
55.1/100
Crime rate
Champion Lakes
8697.7 / 1k
Kelmscott
1179.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Champion Lakes
45
Kelmscott
127
Population
Champion Lakes
1,355
Kelmscott
10,575
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Champion Lakes | Kelmscott |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.2/100 | 55.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 27.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 8697.7 / 1k | 1179.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 97 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 45 | 127 |
| Population | 1,355 | 10,575 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Champion Lakes is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, and Kelmscott is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Champion Lakes is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Kelmscott answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Champion Lakes sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Kelmscott.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Champion Lakes the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kelmscott.