Champion Lakes vs Kelmscott, WA Suburb Comparison

Champion Lakes for families and value; Kelmscott for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Champion LakesKelmscott

Overall score

Champion Lakes

31.3/100

Kelmscott

55.1/100

Crime rate

Champion Lakes

60.1 / 1k

Kelmscott

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Champion Lakes

74

Kelmscott

297

Population

Champion Lakes

1,355

Kelmscott

10,575

Metric leadChampion Lakes 2Kelmscott 82 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChampion LakesKelmscott
Overall score31.3/10055.1/100
Housing (desirability)63.3/10050.3/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools25
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves315
Public transport stops197
Walkability1.5/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities74297
Green cover1.8%32.7%
Population1,35510,575
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Champion Lakes is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, and Kelmscott is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Champion Lakes is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Kelmscott answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Champion Lakes the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kelmscott.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons