Kelmscott vs Roleystone, WA suburb comparison

Kelmscott for families and schools; Roleystone for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KelmscottRoleystone

Overall score

Kelmscott

55.1/100

Roleystone

51.2/100

Crime rate

Kelmscott

1179.4 / 1k

Roleystone

1804.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kelmscott

127

Roleystone

36

Population

Kelmscott

10,575

Roleystone

6,848

Metric leadKelmscott 8Roleystone 2across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKelmscottRoleystone
Overall score55.1/10051.2/100
Housing (desirability)27.6/10076.0/100
Crime rate1179.4 / 1k1804.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools51
Parks & reserves1511
Public transport stops9741
Walkability63.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities12736
Population10,5756,848
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kelmscott is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Roleystone is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city. Kelmscott sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Roleystone is further out with more breathing room.

Kelmscott tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Roleystone stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Kelmscott sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Roleystone.

Kelmscott suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Roleystone is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons