Overall score
Kelmscott
55.1/100
Roleystone
51.2/100
Kelmscott for families and schools; Roleystone for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kelmscott
55.1/100
Roleystone
51.2/100
Crime rate
Kelmscott
1179.4 / 1k
Roleystone
1804.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kelmscott
127
Roleystone
36
Population
Kelmscott
10,575
Roleystone
6,848
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kelmscott | Roleystone |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.1/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 27.6/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 1179.4 / 1k | 1804.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 15 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 97 | 41 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 127 | 36 |
| Population | 10,575 | 6,848 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Kelmscott is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Roleystone is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city. Kelmscott sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Roleystone is further out with more breathing room.
Kelmscott tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Roleystone stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Kelmscott sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Roleystone.
Kelmscott suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Roleystone is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.