Mount Nasura vs Roleystone, WA suburb comparison

Mount Nasura for families and schools; Roleystone for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount NasuraRoleystone

Overall score

Mount Nasura

37.4/100

Roleystone

51.2/100

Crime rate

Mount Nasura

4100.4 / 1k

Roleystone

1804.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Nasura

70

Roleystone

36

Population

Mount Nasura

2,997

Roleystone

6,848

Metric leadMount Nasura 2Roleystone 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount NasuraRoleystone
Overall score37.4/10051.2/100
Housing (desirability)43.7/10076.0/100
Crime rate4100.4 / 1k1804.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools51
Parks & reserves311
Public transport stops1241
Walkability18.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities7036
Population2,9976,848
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/109/10

Comparison summary

Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Roleystone is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Roleystone keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Nasura is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities; Roleystone answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Roleystone, while Mount Nasura remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons