Mount Nasura vs Roleystone, WA Suburb Comparison

Roleystone for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount NasuraRoleystone

Overall score

Mount Nasura

40.2/100

Roleystone

48.7/100

Crime rate

Mount Nasura

60.1 / 1k

Roleystone

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Nasura

123

Roleystone

50

Population

Mount Nasura

2,997

Roleystone

6,848

Metric leadMount Nasura 2Roleystone 82 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount NasuraRoleystone
Overall score40.2/10048.7/100
Housing (desirability)54.1/10061.0/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools51
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves311
Public transport stops1241
Walkability18.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities12350
Green cover11.8%31.0%
Population2,9976,848
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/109/10

Comparison summary

Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Roleystone is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Roleystone keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Mount Nasura is stronger for schools and education options, plus nearby cafés and amenities; Roleystone answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Mount Nasura suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Roleystone is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons