Overall score
Mount Nasura
40.2/100
Roleystone
48.7/100
Roleystone for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Nasura
40.2/100
Roleystone
48.7/100
Crime rate
Mount Nasura
60.1 / 1k
Roleystone
60.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Nasura
123
Roleystone
50
Population
Mount Nasura
2,997
Roleystone
6,848
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Nasura | Roleystone |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.2/100 | 48.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.1/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.1 / 1k | 60.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 41 |
| Walkability | 18.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 123 | 50 |
| Green cover | 11.8% | 31.0% |
| Population | 2,997 | 6,848 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 9/10 |
Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Roleystone is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Mount Nasura sits among greener hillside streets, while Roleystone keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Nasura is stronger for schools and education options, plus nearby cafés and amenities; Roleystone answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Mount Nasura suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Roleystone is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.