Mount Nasura vs Mount Richon, WA suburb comparison

Mount Nasura for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount NasuraMount Richon

Overall score

Mount Nasura

37.4/100

Mount Richon

25.1/100

Crime rate

Mount Nasura

4100.4 / 1k

Mount Richon

5981.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Nasura

70

Mount Richon

10

Population

Mount Nasura

2,997

Mount Richon

2,067

Metric leadMount Nasura 8Mount Richon 01 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount NasuraMount Richon
Overall score37.4/10025.1/100
Housing (desirability)43.7/10020.4/100
Crime rate4100.4 / 1k5981.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Parks & reserves3
Public transport stops124
Walkability18.0/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities7010
Population2,9972,067
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Mount Richon is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Mount Richon is further out with more breathing room.

Mount Nasura tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Mount Richon stands out for improving crime trends and a mature, settled community.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Mount Nasura, while Mount Richon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons