Mount Nasura vs Mount Richon, WA Suburb Comparison

Mount Nasura for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount NasuraMount Richon

Overall score

Mount Nasura

40.2/100

Mount Richon

34.1/100

Crime rate

Mount Nasura

60.1 / 1k

Mount Richon

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Nasura

123

Mount Richon

13

Population

Mount Nasura

2,997

Mount Richon

2,067

Metric leadMount Nasura 8Mount Richon 03 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount NasuraMount Richon
Overall score40.2/10034.1/100
Housing (desirability)54.1/10051.8/100
Crime rate60.1 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves3—
Public transport stops124
Walkability18.0/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities12313
Green cover11.8%0.1%
Population2,9972,067
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mount Nasura is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Mount Richon is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Nasura sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Mount Richon is further out with more breathing room.

Mount Nasura tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, while Mount Richon stands out for a multicultural community mix and improving crime trends.

On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mount Nasura, while Mount Richon remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons