Overall score
Christmas Hills
43.0/100
Kangaroo Ground
46.0/100
Christmas Hills for schools; Kangaroo Ground for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Christmas Hills
43.0/100
Kangaroo Ground
46.0/100
Crime rate
Christmas Hills
195.7 / 1k
Kangaroo Ground
49.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Christmas Hills
13
Kangaroo Ground
17
Population
Christmas Hills
365
Kangaroo Ground
1,208
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Christmas Hills | Kangaroo Ground |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.1/100 | 72.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 195.7 / 1k | 49.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | — | 12 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 22.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 17 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 35 |
| Population | 365 | 1,208 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Christmas Hills is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Kangaroo Ground is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood.
On the data, Christmas Hills is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Kangaroo Ground answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Christmas Hills if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Kangaroo Ground for investors and value-focused buyers.