Chum Creek vs Yarra Glen, VIC suburb comparison

Chum Creek for families and value; Yarra Glen for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chum CreekYarra Glen

Overall score

Chum Creek

51.1/100

Yarra Glen

53.9/100

Crime rate

Chum Creek

8.3 / 1k

Yarra Glen

32.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chum Creek

5

Yarra Glen

69

Population

Chum Creek

981

Yarra Glen

3,012

Metric leadChum Creek 3Yarra Glen 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChum CreekYarra Glen
Overall score51.1/10053.9/100
Housing (desirability)74.8/10061.8/100
Crime rate8.3 / 1k32.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves22
Public transport stops6
Walkability0.0/10046.0/100
Nearby amenities569
Planning activity1761
Population9813,012
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chum Creek is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Yarra Glen is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Chum Creek sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Yarra Glen is within day-trip reach of the capital.

Chum Creek tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Yarra Glen stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

Families and value-focused buyers may find Chum Creek the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Yarra Glen.

Related comparisons