Overall score
Chum Creek
51.1/100
Yarra Glen
53.9/100
Chum Creek for families and value; Yarra Glen for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chum Creek
51.1/100
Yarra Glen
53.9/100
Crime rate
Chum Creek
8.3 / 1k
Yarra Glen
32.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chum Creek
5
Yarra Glen
69
Population
Chum Creek
981
Yarra Glen
3,012
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chum Creek | Yarra Glen |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.1/100 | 53.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.8/100 | 61.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.3 / 1k | 32.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 6 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 69 |
| Planning activity | 17 | 61 |
| Population | 981 | 3,012 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Chum Creek is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Yarra Glen is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Chum Creek sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Yarra Glen is within day-trip reach of the capital.
Chum Creek tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Yarra Glen stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
Families and value-focused buyers may find Chum Creek the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Yarra Glen.