Chum Creek vs Yarra Glen, VIC Suburb Comparison

Chum Creek for schools; Yarra Glen for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Chum CreekYarra Glen

Overall score

Chum Creek

48.7/100

Yarra Glen

54.9/100

Crime rate

Chum Creek

14.8 / 1k

Yarra Glen

33.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chum Creek

6

Yarra Glen

77

Population

Chum Creek

981

Yarra Glen

3,012

Metric leadChum Creek 2Yarra Glen 73 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChum CreekYarra Glen
Overall score48.7/10054.9/100
Housing (desirability)50.2/10054.8/100
Crime rate14.8 / 1k33.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves22
Public transport stops—6
Walkability0.0/10044.0/100
Nearby amenities677
Planning activity1761
Green cover2.4%6.1%
Population9813,012
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chum Creek is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Yarra Glen is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Chum Creek sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Yarra Glen is within day-trip reach of the capital.

Chum Creek tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, while Yarra Glen stands out for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability. On housing, Chum Creek sits in a well priced band, compared with a gently premium feel in Yarra Glen.

Families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Chum Creek the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Yarra Glen.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons