Steels Creek vs Yarra Glen, VIC Suburb Comparison

Steels Creek for retirees and schools; Yarra Glen for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Steels CreekYarra Glen

Overall score

Steels Creek

59.1/100

Yarra Glen

54.9/100

Crime rate

Steels Creek

19.8 / 1k

Yarra Glen

33.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Steels Creek

9

Yarra Glen

77

Population

Steels Creek

276

Yarra Glen

3,012

Metric leadSteels Creek 5Yarra Glen 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySteels CreekYarra Glen
Overall score59.1/10054.9/100
Housing (desirability)36.8/10054.8/100
Crime rate19.8 / 1k33.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves22
Public transport stops—6
Walkability0.0/10044.0/100
Nearby amenities977
Planning activity1561
Green cover54.5%6.1%
Population2763,012
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Steels Creek is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Yarra Glen is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Steels Creek sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Yarra Glen is within day-trip reach of the capital.

On the data, Steels Creek is stronger for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Yarra Glen answers with housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Steels Creek sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Yarra Glen.

Retirees and families may find Steels Creek the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Yarra Glen.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons