Overall score
Dixons Creek
43.6/100
Yarra Glen
53.9/100
Dixons Creek for families; Yarra Glen for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Dixons Creek
43.6/100
Yarra Glen
53.9/100
Crime rate
Dixons Creek
42.2 / 1k
Yarra Glen
32.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dixons Creek
2
Yarra Glen
69
Population
Dixons Creek
344
Yarra Glen
3,012
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dixons Creek | Yarra Glen |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.6/100 | 53.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.0/100 | 61.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.2 / 1k | 32.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 6 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 69 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 61 |
| Population | 344 | 3,012 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Dixons Creek is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Yarra Glen is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Dixons Creek sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Yarra Glen is within day-trip reach of the capital.
On the data, Dixons Creek is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Yarra Glen answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves. On housing, Dixons Creek sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Yarra Glen.
Retirees and families may find Dixons Creek the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Yarra Glen.