Overall score
Claymore
35.1/100
St Andrews
52.7/100
Claymore for schools; St Andrews for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Claymore
35.1/100
St Andrews
52.7/100
Crime rate
Claymore
86.4 / 1k
St Andrews
56.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Claymore
41
St Andrews
45
Population
Claymore
2,579
St Andrews
5,785
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Claymore | St Andrews |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.1/100 | 52.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 10.7/100 | 62.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 86.4 / 1k | 56.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 36 | 48 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 41 | 45 |
| Planning activity | 21 | 5 |
| Population | 2,579 | 5,785 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 3/10 |
Claymore is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, while St Andrews is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Claymore is stronger for parks and reserves and walkability; St Andrews answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer St Andrews, while Claymore remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.