Kearns vs St Andrews, NSW suburb comparison

Kearns for retirees and families; St Andrews for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KearnsSt Andrews

Overall score

Kearns

45.9/100

St Andrews

52.7/100

Crime rate

Kearns

34.0 / 1k

St Andrews

56.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kearns

25

St Andrews

45

Population

Kearns

2,693

St Andrews

5,785

Metric leadKearns 4St Andrews 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKearnsSt Andrews
Overall score45.9/10052.7/100
Housing (desirability)62.7/10062.6/100
Crime rate34.0 / 1k56.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools67
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops2948
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities2545
Planning activity15
Population2,6935,785
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kearns is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, and St Andrews is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Kearns sits further out with more breathing room, whereas St Andrews is in a middle-ring position.

Kearns tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while St Andrews stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access. On housing, Kearns sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in St Andrews.

Retirees and families may find Kearns the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer St Andrews.

Related comparisons