Overall score
Kearns
45.9/100
St Andrews
52.7/100
Kearns for retirees and families; St Andrews for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kearns
45.9/100
St Andrews
52.7/100
Crime rate
Kearns
34.0 / 1k
St Andrews
56.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kearns
25
St Andrews
45
Population
Kearns
2,693
St Andrews
5,785
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kearns | St Andrews |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.9/100 | 52.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.7/100 | 62.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.0 / 1k | 56.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 48 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 25 | 45 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 5 |
| Population | 2,693 | 5,785 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 3/10 |
Put side by side, Kearns is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, and St Andrews is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Kearns sits further out with more breathing room, whereas St Andrews is in a middle-ring position.
Kearns tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while St Andrews stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access. On housing, Kearns sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in St Andrews.
Retirees and families may find Kearns the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer St Andrews.