Concord vs Wareemba, NSW Suburb Comparison

Concord for retirees and families; Wareemba for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConcordWareemba

Overall score

Concord

65.3/100

Wareemba

55.9/100

Crime rate

Concord

29.6 / 1k

Wareemba

34.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Concord

286

Wareemba

25

Population

Concord

14,551

Wareemba

1,519

Metric leadConcord 10Wareemba 12 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConcordWareemba
Overall score65.3/10055.9/100
Housing (desirability)55.3/10054.3/100
Crime rate29.6 / 1k34.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools127
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves141
Public transport stops15510
Walkability73.0/10042.0/100
Nearby amenities28625
Planning activity373
Green cover9.4%0.5%
Population14,5511,519
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Concord reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Wareemba is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Concord tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Wareemba stands out for a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Concord, while Wareemba remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons