Overall score
Concord
65.3/100
Rodd Point
55.9/100
Concord vs Rodd Point, NSW Suburb Comparison
Concord for retirees and value; Rodd Point for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConcordRodd Point
Crime rate
Concord
29.6 / 1k
Rodd Point
33.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Concord
286
Rodd Point
33
Population
Concord
14,551
Rodd Point
1,380
Metric leadConcord 9Rodd Point 13 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesConcord
- Best for familiesRodd Point
- Best for investmentRodd Point
- Best for best valueConcord
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Concord | Rodd Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.3/100 | 55.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.3/100 | 40.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.6 / 1k | 33.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 12 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 155 | 23 |
| Walkability | 73.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 286 | 33 |
| Planning activity | 37 | 6 |
| Green cover | 9.4% | 7.7% |
| Population | 14,551 | 1,380 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Concord is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Rodd Point is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Concord pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, whereas Rodd Point is the better pick for a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Concord, while Rodd Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.