Overall score
Concord
69.1/100
Russell Lea
43.6/100
Concord vs Russell Lea, NSW suburb comparison
Concord for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConcordRussell Lea
Crime rate
Concord
29.6 / 1k
Russell Lea
34.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Concord
267
Russell Lea
33
Population
Concord
14,551
Russell Lea
4,920
Metric leadConcord 8Russell Lea 11 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Concord | Russell Lea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.1/100 | 43.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 36.0/100 | 20.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.6 / 1k | 34.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | — |
| Public transport stops | 155 | 31 |
| Walkability | 71.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 267 | 33 |
| Planning activity | 34 | 10 |
| Population | 14,551 | 4,920 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Concord is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Russell Lea is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel.
On the data, Concord is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Russell Lea answers with a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Concord, while Russell Lea remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.