Overall score
Concord
65.3/100
Russell Lea
52.2/100
Concord vs Russell Lea, NSW Suburb Comparison
Concord for retirees and families; Russell Lea for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConcordRussell Lea
Crime rate
Concord
29.6 / 1k
Russell Lea
34.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Concord
286
Russell Lea
43
Population
Concord
14,551
Russell Lea
4,920
Metric leadConcord 9Russell Lea 12 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesConcord
- Best for familiesConcord
- Best for investmentRussell Lea
- Best for best valueConcord
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Concord | Russell Lea |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.3/100 | 52.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.3/100 | 47.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.6 / 1k | 34.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | — |
| Public transport stops | 155 | 31 |
| Walkability | 73.0/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 286 | 43 |
| Planning activity | 37 | 10 |
| Green cover | 9.4% | 0.3% |
| Population | 14,551 | 4,920 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Concord is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Russell Lea is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
On the data, Concord is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options; Russell Lea answers with a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Concord, while Russell Lea remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.