Overall score
Coningham
38.4/100
Electrona
42.1/100
Coningham vs Electrona, TAS Suburb Comparison
Electrona for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ConinghamElectrona
Crime rate
Coningham
22.8 / 1k
Electrona
22.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coningham
13
Electrona
11
Population
Coningham
328
Electrona
391
Metric leadConingham 2Electrona 52 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coningham | Electrona |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.4/100 | 42.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.8/100 | 41.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.8 / 1k | 22.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 11 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 14.9% |
| Population | 328 | 391 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Coningham is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Electrona is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Coningham sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Electrona is in a middle-ring position.
Coningham tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Electrona stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and overall desirability. On housing, Coningham sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Electrona.
Coningham suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Electrona is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.