Overall score
Coningham
38.4/100
Lower Snug
39.6/100
Coningham for investment; Lower Snug for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coningham
38.4/100
Lower Snug
39.6/100
Crime rate
Coningham
22.8 / 1k
Lower Snug
22.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coningham
13
Lower Snug
12
Population
Coningham
328
Lower Snug
460
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coningham | Lower Snug |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.4/100 | 39.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.8/100 | 33.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.8 / 1k | 22.8 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | — | 6 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 9.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 12 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 328 | 460 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Coningham is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Lower Snug is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
On the data, Coningham is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage; Lower Snug answers with housing affordability, walkability, and overall desirability. On housing, Coningham sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Lower Snug.
Retirees may find Coningham the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Lower Snug.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.