Coningham vs Tinderbox, TAS suburb comparison

Tinderbox for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConinghamTinderbox

Overall score

Coningham

25.4/100

Tinderbox

31.0/100

Crime rate

Coningham

4231.9 / 1k

Tinderbox

3503.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coningham

7

Tinderbox

3

Population

Coningham

328

Tinderbox

392

Metric leadConingham 1Tinderbox 51 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConinghamTinderbox
Overall score25.4/10031.0/100
Housing (desirability)2.2/1007.4/100
Crime rate4231.9 / 1k3503.7 / 1k
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities73
Population328392
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Coningham reads as a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm; Tinderbox is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city. Coningham sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Tinderbox is in a middle-ring position.

Coningham tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, while Tinderbox stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Tinderbox, while Coningham remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons