Overall score
Connells Point
53.9/100
Peakhurst Heights
51.7/100
Connells Point for retirees and families; Peakhurst Heights for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Connells Point
53.9/100
Peakhurst Heights
51.7/100
Crime rate
Connells Point
24.1 / 1k
Peakhurst Heights
71.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Connells Point
54
Peakhurst Heights
60
Population
Connells Point
2,884
Peakhurst Heights
2,524
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Connells Point | Peakhurst Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.9/100 | 51.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.6/100 | 43.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 24.1 / 1k | 71.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 30 | 41 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 54 | 60 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 3 |
| Population | 2,884 | 2,524 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Connells Point reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Peakhurst Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Peakhurst Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Connells Point keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Connells Point pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and overall desirability, whereas Peakhurst Heights is the better pick for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Retirees and families may find Connells Point the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Peakhurst Heights.