Connells Point vs Peakhurst Heights, NSW Suburb Comparison

Connells Point for families and schools; Peakhurst Heights for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Connells PointPeakhurst Heights

Overall score

Connells Point

61.4/100

Peakhurst Heights

57.7/100

Crime rate

Connells Point

24.1 / 1k

Peakhurst Heights

71.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Connells Point

57

Peakhurst Heights

64

Population

Connells Point

2,884

Peakhurst Heights

2,524

Metric leadConnells Point 4Peakhurst Heights 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConnells PointPeakhurst Heights
Overall score61.4/10057.7/100
Housing (desirability)48.4/10052.0/100
Crime rate24.1 / 1k71.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools146
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves45
Public transport stops3041
Walkability30.0/10047.0/100
Nearby amenities5764
Planning activity163
Green cover11.3%12.3%
Population2,8842,524
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Connells Point reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Peakhurst Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Peakhurst Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Connells Point keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Connells Point pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and overall desirability, whereas Peakhurst Heights is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Connells Point the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Peakhurst Heights.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons