Hurstville Grove vs Peakhurst Heights, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Hurstville Grove | Peakhurst Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.2/100 | 46.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.0/100 | 43.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 126.2 / 1k | 77.3 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 30 | 41 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 47 | 60 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 1 |
| Population | 2,606 | 2,524 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesPeakhurst Heights
- Best for investmentPeakhurst Heights
- Best for best valuePeakhurst Heights
- Best for best schoolsHurstville Grove
Comparison summary
Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Peakhurst Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Peakhurst Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Hurstville Grove keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Hurstville Grove is stronger for parks and reserves and a larger local community; Peakhurst Heights answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Households prioritising schools may find Hurstville Grove the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Peakhurst Heights.