Carss Park vs Hurstville Grove, NSW Suburb Comparison

Carss Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Carss ParkHurstville Grove

Overall score

Carss Park

68.2/100

Hurstville Grove

53.6/100

Crime rate

Carss Park

23.8 / 1k

Hurstville Grove

119.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carss Park

69

Hurstville Grove

51

Population

Carss Park

1,265

Hurstville Grove

2,606

Metric leadCarss Park 7Hurstville Grove 42 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarss ParkHurstville Grove
Overall score68.2/10053.6/100
Housing (desirability)59.4/10045.1/100
Crime rate23.8 / 1k119.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1017
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops1630
Walkability47.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities6951
Planning activity68
Green cover32.9%20.3%
Population1,2652,606
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Carss Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Carss Park pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability, whereas Hurstville Grove is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Carss Park, while Hurstville Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons