Overall score
Carss Park
52.8/100
Hurstville Grove
39.6/100
Carss Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Carss Park
52.8/100
Hurstville Grove
39.6/100
Crime rate
Carss Park
23.8 / 1k
Hurstville Grove
119.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Carss Park
62
Hurstville Grove
47
Population
Carss Park
1,265
Hurstville Grove
2,606
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Carss Park | Hurstville Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.8/100 | 39.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.6/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.8 / 1k | 119.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 17 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 30 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 62 | 47 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 7 |
| Population | 1,265 | 2,606 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Carss Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Carss Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Hurstville Grove is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Carss Park, while Hurstville Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.