Carss Park vs Hurstville Grove, NSW suburb comparison

Carss Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Carss ParkHurstville Grove

Overall score

Carss Park

52.8/100

Hurstville Grove

39.6/100

Crime rate

Carss Park

23.8 / 1k

Hurstville Grove

119.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carss Park

62

Hurstville Grove

47

Population

Carss Park

1,265

Hurstville Grove

2,606

Metric leadCarss Park 6Hurstville Grove 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarss ParkHurstville Grove
Overall score52.8/10039.6/100
Housing (desirability)40.6/10040.0/100
Crime rate23.8 / 1k119.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1017
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops1630
Walkability47.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities6247
Planning activity37
Population1,2652,606
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Carss Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Carss Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Hurstville Grove is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Carss Park, while Hurstville Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons