Overall score
Beverly Hills
56.7/100
Hurstville Grove
53.6/100
Beverly Hills for retirees; Hurstville Grove for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beverly Hills
56.7/100
Hurstville Grove
53.6/100
Crime rate
Beverly Hills
42.5 / 1k
Hurstville Grove
119.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beverly Hills
264
Hurstville Grove
51
Population
Beverly Hills
10,483
Hurstville Grove
2,606
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beverly Hills | Hurstville Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.7/100 | 53.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.0/100 | 45.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.5 / 1k | 119.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 17 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 100 | 30 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 264 | 51 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 8 |
| Green cover | 3.5% | 20.3% |
| Population | 10,483 | 2,606 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Beverly Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Beverly Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hurstville Grove keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Beverly Hills is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Hurstville Grove answers with schools and education options, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Beverly Hills the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hurstville Grove.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.