Beverly Hills vs Hurstville Grove, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beverly Hills | Hurstville Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.2/100 | 35.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.6/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.1 / 1k | 126.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 100 | 30 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 184 | 47 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 5 |
| Population | 10,483 | 2,606 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBeverly Hills
- Best for familiesBeverly Hills
- Best for investmentBeverly Hills
- Best for best valueBeverly Hills
- Best for best schoolsBeverly Hills
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Beverly Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Beverly Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hurstville Grove keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Beverly Hills is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurstville Grove answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Beverly Hills, while Hurstville Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.