Overall score
Beverly Hills
65.8/100
Hurstville Grove
39.6/100
Beverly Hills for retirees and families; Hurstville Grove for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beverly Hills
65.8/100
Hurstville Grove
39.6/100
Crime rate
Beverly Hills
42.5 / 1k
Hurstville Grove
119.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beverly Hills
184
Hurstville Grove
47
Population
Beverly Hills
10,483
Hurstville Grove
2,606
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beverly Hills | Hurstville Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.8/100 | 39.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.6/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.5 / 1k | 119.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 17 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 100 | 30 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 184 | 47 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 7 |
| Population | 10,483 | 2,606 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Beverly Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Beverly Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hurstville Grove keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Beverly Hills is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurstville Grove answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Beverly Hills, while Hurstville Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.