Beverly Hills vs Hurstville Grove, NSW Suburb Comparison

Beverly Hills for retirees; Hurstville Grove for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beverly HillsHurstville Grove

Overall score

Beverly Hills

56.7/100

Hurstville Grove

53.6/100

Crime rate

Beverly Hills

42.5 / 1k

Hurstville Grove

119.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beverly Hills

264

Hurstville Grove

51

Population

Beverly Hills

10,483

Hurstville Grove

2,606

Metric leadBeverly Hills 8Hurstville Grove 41 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeverly HillsHurstville Grove
Overall score56.7/10053.6/100
Housing (desirability)55.0/10045.1/100
Crime rate42.5 / 1k119.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1417
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves146
Public transport stops10030
Walkability100.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities26451
Planning activity118
Green cover3.5%20.3%
Population10,4832,606
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beverly Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Beverly Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hurstville Grove keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Beverly Hills is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Hurstville Grove answers with schools and education options, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Beverly Hills the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hurstville Grove.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons