Beverly Hills vs Hurstville Grove, NSW suburb comparison

Beverly Hills for retirees and families; Hurstville Grove for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beverly HillsHurstville Grove

Overall score

Beverly Hills

65.8/100

Hurstville Grove

39.6/100

Crime rate

Beverly Hills

42.5 / 1k

Hurstville Grove

119.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beverly Hills

184

Hurstville Grove

47

Population

Beverly Hills

10,483

Hurstville Grove

2,606

Metric leadBeverly Hills 8Hurstville Grove 3across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeverly HillsHurstville Grove
Overall score65.8/10039.6/100
Housing (desirability)42.6/10040.0/100
Crime rate42.5 / 1k119.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1417
Parks & reserves146
Public transport stops10030
Walkability100.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities18447
Planning activity107
Population10,4832,606
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beverly Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Beverly Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hurstville Grove keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Beverly Hills is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurstville Grove answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Beverly Hills, while Hurstville Grove remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons