Beverly Hills vs Peakhurst, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beverly Hills | Peakhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.2/100 | 56.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.6/100 | 32.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.1 / 1k | 77.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 17 |
| Public transport stops | 100 | 169 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 184 | 152 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 21 |
| Population | 10,483 | 12,079 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBeverly Hills
- Best for familiesBeverly Hills
- Best for investmentBeverly Hills
- Best for best valueBeverly Hills
- Best for best schoolsPeakhurst
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Beverly Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Peakhurst is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Beverly Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Peakhurst keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Beverly Hills tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Peakhurst stands out for schools and education options and parks and reserves.
Choose Beverly Hills if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Peakhurst for households prioritising schools.