Oatley vs Peakhurst, NSW Suburb Comparison

Oatley for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

OatleyPeakhurst

Overall score

Oatley

68.9/100

Peakhurst

54.4/100

Crime rate

Oatley

29.6 / 1k

Peakhurst

71.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Oatley

241

Peakhurst

160

Population

Oatley

10,664

Peakhurst

12,079

Metric leadOatley 8Peakhurst 41 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryOatleyPeakhurst
Overall score68.9/10054.4/100
Housing (desirability)59.1/10045.0/100
Crime rate29.6 / 1k71.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools811
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves2617
Public transport stops104169
Walkability82.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities241160
Planning activity4031
Green cover20.7%7.7%
Population10,66412,079
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Oatley is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Peakhurst is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Oatley is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Peakhurst answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Oatley, while Peakhurst remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons