Oatley vs South Hurstville, NSW suburb comparison

Oatley for value and schools; South Hurstville for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

OatleySouth Hurstville

Overall score

Oatley

64.3/100

South Hurstville

59.1/100

Crime rate

Oatley

29.6 / 1k

South Hurstville

24.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Oatley

200

South Hurstville

74

Population

Oatley

10,664

South Hurstville

5,221

Metric leadOatley 8South Hurstville 3across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryOatleySouth Hurstville
Overall score64.3/10059.1/100
Housing (desirability)40.1/10026.5/100
Crime rate29.6 / 1k24.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools815
Parks & reserves265
Public transport stops10451
Walkability82.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities20074
Planning activity334
Population10,6645,221
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Oatley is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and South Hurstville is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Oatley pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas South Hurstville is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Oatley, while South Hurstville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons