Oatley vs South Hurstville, NSW Suburb Comparison

Oatley for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

OatleySouth Hurstville

Overall score

Oatley

68.9/100

South Hurstville

56.3/100

Crime rate

Oatley

29.6 / 1k

South Hurstville

24.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Oatley

241

South Hurstville

78

Population

Oatley

10,664

South Hurstville

5,221

Metric leadOatley 9South Hurstville 31 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryOatleySouth Hurstville
Overall score68.9/10056.3/100
Housing (desirability)59.1/10038.9/100
Crime rate29.6 / 1k24.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools815
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves265
Public transport stops10451
Walkability82.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities24178
Planning activity406
Green cover20.7%2.3%
Population10,6645,221
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Oatley is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and South Hurstville is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Oatley pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas South Hurstville is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.

Value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools may find Oatley the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer South Hurstville.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons