Beverley Park vs South Hurstville, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beverley Park | South Hurstville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.9/100 | 57.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 15.2/100 | 26.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.2 / 1k | 28.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 51 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 74 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 3 |
| Population | 2,646 | 5,221 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesSouth Hurstville
- Best for familiesSouth Hurstville
- Best for investmentBeverley Park
- Best for best valueSouth Hurstville
- Best for best schoolsSouth Hurstville
Comparison summary
Beverley Park reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; South Hurstville is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Beverley Park pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas South Hurstville is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Beverley Park if you are weighing investors; lean toward South Hurstville for retirees and families.