Beverley Park vs South Hurstville, NSW Suburb Comparison

Beverley Park for families; South Hurstville for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beverley ParkSouth Hurstville

Overall score

Beverley Park

45.6/100

South Hurstville

56.3/100

Crime rate

Beverley Park

59.8 / 1k

South Hurstville

24.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beverley Park

51

South Hurstville

78

Population

Beverley Park

2,646

South Hurstville

5,221

Metric leadBeverley Park 1South Hurstville 102 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeverley ParkSouth Hurstville
Overall score45.6/10056.3/100
Housing (desirability)25.2/10038.9/100
Crime rate59.8 / 1k24.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools1515
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves45
Public transport stops2351
Walkability30.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities5178
Planning activity116
Green cover2.1%2.3%
Population2,6465,221
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Beverley Park reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; South Hurstville is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Beverley Park pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas South Hurstville is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

Choose Beverley Park if you are weighing investors and households prioritising schools; lean toward South Hurstville for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons