Overall score
Beverley Park
45.6/100
South Hurstville
56.3/100
Beverley Park for families; South Hurstville for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beverley Park
45.6/100
South Hurstville
56.3/100
Crime rate
Beverley Park
59.8 / 1k
South Hurstville
24.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beverley Park
51
South Hurstville
78
Population
Beverley Park
2,646
South Hurstville
5,221
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beverley Park | South Hurstville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.6/100 | 56.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 25.2/100 | 38.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.8 / 1k | 24.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 15 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 51 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 51 | 78 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 6 |
| Green cover | 2.1% | 2.3% |
| Population | 2,646 | 5,221 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Beverley Park reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; South Hurstville is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Beverley Park pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas South Hurstville is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.
Choose Beverley Park if you are weighing investors and households prioritising schools; lean toward South Hurstville for retirees, families, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.