Beverley Park vs Blakehurst, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beverley Park | Blakehurst |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.9/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 15.2/100 | 26.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.2 / 1k | 28.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 12 |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 82 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 158 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 11 |
| Population | 2,646 | 6,652 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBlakehurst
- Best for familiesBlakehurst
- Best for investmentBeverley Park
- Best for best valueBlakehurst
- Best for best schoolsBlakehurst
Comparison summary
Beverley Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Blakehurst is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Beverley Park pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas Blakehurst is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Beverley Park if you are weighing investors; lean toward Blakehurst for retirees and families.