Blakehurst vs Hurstville Grove, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Blakehurst | Hurstville Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.5/100 | 35.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.9/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.1 / 1k | 126.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 82 | 30 |
| Walkability | 38.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 158 | 47 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 5 |
| Population | 6,652 | 2,606 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBlakehurst
- Best for familiesBlakehurst
- Best for investmentHurstville Grove
- Best for best valueBlakehurst
- Best for best schoolsBlakehurst
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Blakehurst is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Hurstville Grove is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Blakehurst tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Hurstville Grove stands out for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
Retirees and families may find Blakehurst the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Hurstville Grove.