Blakehurst vs Hurstville, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Blakehurst | Hurstville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.5/100 | 60.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.9/100 | 15.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.1 / 1k | 126.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 18 |
| Public transport stops | 82 | 227 |
| Walkability | 38.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 158 | 541 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 20 |
| Population | 6,652 | 31,162 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBlakehurst
- Best for familiesBlakehurst
- Best for investmentBlakehurst
- Best for best valueBlakehurst
- Best for best schoolsHurstville
Comparison summary
Blakehurst reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Hurstville is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Blakehurst pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Hurstville is the better pick for schools and education options and parks and reserves.
Choose Blakehurst if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Hurstville for households prioritising schools.