Hurstville vs Kogarah, NSW suburb comparison

Hurstville for value and schools; Kogarah for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HurstvilleKogarah

Overall score

Hurstville

60.6/100

Kogarah

59.1/100

Crime rate

Hurstville

119.3 / 1k

Kogarah

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hurstville

541

Kogarah

259

Population

Hurstville

31,162

Kogarah

16,416

Metric leadHurstville 7Kogarah 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHurstvilleKogarah
Overall score60.6/10059.1/100
Housing (desirability)15.9/10010.8/100
Crime rate119.3 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools2016
Parks & reserves187
Public transport stops22795
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities541259
Planning activity2320
Population31,16216,416
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Hurstville reads as an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Kogarah is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Hurstville pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas Kogarah is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools may find Hurstville the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Kogarah.

Related comparisons