Hurstville vs Kogarah, NSW Suburb Comparison

Hurstville for investment and schools; Kogarah for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HurstvilleKogarah

Overall score

Hurstville

50.0/100

Kogarah

50.9/100

Crime rate

Hurstville

119.3 / 1k

Kogarah

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hurstville

705

Kogarah

302

Population

Hurstville

31,162

Kogarah

16,416

Metric leadHurstville 6Kogarah 52 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHurstvilleKogarah
Overall score50.0/10050.9/100
Housing (desirability)32.9/10042.9/100
Crime rate119.3 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools2016
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves187
Public transport stops22795
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities705302
Planning activity2627
Green cover2.8%12.9%
Population31,16216,416
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Hurstville reads as an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Kogarah is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Hurstville pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Kogarah is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools may find Hurstville the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Kogarah.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons