Overall score
Carss Park
52.8/100
Hurstville
60.6/100
Carss Park for retirees and families; Hurstville for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Carss Park
52.8/100
Hurstville
60.6/100
Crime rate
Carss Park
23.8 / 1k
Hurstville
119.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Carss Park
62
Hurstville
541
Population
Carss Park
1,265
Hurstville
31,162
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Carss Park | Hurstville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.8/100 | 60.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.6/100 | 15.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 23.8 / 1k | 119.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 20 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 18 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 227 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 62 | 541 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 22 |
| Population | 1,265 | 31,162 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Carss Park reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Hurstville is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Carss Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Hurstville is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access.
Retirees and investors may find Carss Park the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hurstville.