Carss Park vs Hurstville, NSW suburb comparison

Carss Park for retirees and families; Hurstville for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Carss ParkHurstville

Overall score

Carss Park

52.8/100

Hurstville

60.6/100

Crime rate

Carss Park

23.8 / 1k

Hurstville

119.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carss Park

62

Hurstville

541

Population

Carss Park

1,265

Hurstville

31,162

Metric leadCarss Park 4Hurstville 7across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarss ParkHurstville
Overall score52.8/10060.6/100
Housing (desirability)40.6/10015.9/100
Crime rate23.8 / 1k119.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1020
Parks & reserves218
Public transport stops16227
Walkability47.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities62541
Planning activity322
Population1,26531,162
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/107/10

Comparison summary

Carss Park reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Hurstville is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Carss Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Hurstville is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access.

Retirees and investors may find Carss Park the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hurstville.

Related comparisons