Beverly Hills vs Hurstville, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beverly Hills | Hurstville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.2/100 | 60.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.6/100 | 15.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.1 / 1k | 126.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 18 |
| Public transport stops | 100 | 227 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 184 | 541 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 20 |
| Population | 10,483 | 31,162 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBeverly Hills
- Best for familiesBeverly Hills
- Best for investmentBeverly Hills
- Best for best valueBeverly Hills
- Best for best schoolsHurstville
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Beverly Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Hurstville is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Beverly Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hurstville keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Beverly Hills is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurstville answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.
Beverly Hills suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Hurstville is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.