Overall score
Beverly Hills
65.8/100
Hurstville
60.6/100
Beverly Hills for retirees and families; Hurstville for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beverly Hills
65.8/100
Hurstville
60.6/100
Crime rate
Beverly Hills
42.5 / 1k
Hurstville
119.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beverly Hills
184
Hurstville
541
Population
Beverly Hills
10,483
Hurstville
31,162
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beverly Hills | Hurstville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.8/100 | 60.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.6/100 | 15.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.5 / 1k | 119.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 20 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 18 |
| Public transport stops | 100 | 227 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 184 | 541 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 23 |
| Population | 10,483 | 31,162 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Beverly Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Hurstville is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Beverly Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hurstville keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Beverly Hills is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurstville answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.
Beverly Hills suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Hurstville is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.