Beverly Hills vs Hurstville, NSW suburb comparison

Beverly Hills for retirees and families; Hurstville for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beverly HillsHurstville

Overall score

Beverly Hills

65.8/100

Hurstville

60.6/100

Crime rate

Beverly Hills

42.5 / 1k

Hurstville

119.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beverly Hills

184

Hurstville

541

Population

Beverly Hills

10,483

Hurstville

31,162

Metric leadBeverly Hills 5Hurstville 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeverly HillsHurstville
Overall score65.8/10060.6/100
Housing (desirability)42.6/10015.9/100
Crime rate42.5 / 1k119.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1420
Parks & reserves1418
Public transport stops100227
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities184541
Planning activity1023
Population10,48331,162
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beverly Hills is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Hurstville is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Beverly Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hurstville keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Beverly Hills is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurstville answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.

Beverly Hills suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Hurstville is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons