Beverley Park vs Hurstville, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beverley Park | Hurstville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.9/100 | 60.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 15.2/100 | 15.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.2 / 1k | 126.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 18 |
| Public transport stops | 23 | 227 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 541 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 20 |
| Population | 2,646 | 31,162 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBeverley Park
- Best for familiesHurstville
- Best for investmentBeverley Park
- Best for best valueHurstville
- Best for best schoolsHurstville
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Beverley Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Hurstville is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Beverley Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Hurstville is the better pick for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Retirees and investors may find Beverley Park the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Hurstville.