Beverley Park vs Kyle Bay, NSW Suburb Comparison

Beverley Park for families; Kyle Bay for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beverley ParkKyle Bay

Overall score

Beverley Park

45.6/100

Kyle Bay

52.4/100

Crime rate

Beverley Park

59.8 / 1k

Kyle Bay

24.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beverley Park

51

Kyle Bay

24

Population

Beverley Park

2,646

Kyle Bay

1,039

Metric leadBeverley Park 5Kyle Bay 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeverley ParkKyle Bay
Overall score45.6/10052.4/100
Housing (desirability)25.2/10045.8/100
Crime rate59.8 / 1k24.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools159
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves4—
Public transport stops238
Walkability30.0/10016.0/100
Nearby amenities5124
Planning activity113
Green cover2.1%2.5%
Population2,6461,039
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Beverley Park reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Kyle Bay is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Beverley Park pulls ahead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Kyle Bay is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kyle Bay, while Beverley Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons