Connells Point vs Hurstville, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Connells Point | Hurstville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.3/100 | 60.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.6/100 | 15.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.1 / 1k | 126.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 18 |
| Public transport stops | 30 | 227 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 54 | 541 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 20 |
| Population | 2,884 | 31,162 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesConnells Point
- Best for familiesConnells Point
- Best for investmentConnells Point
- Best for best valueConnells Point
- Best for best schoolsHurstville
Comparison summary
Connells Point reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Hurstville is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Connells Point is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hurstville answers with parks and reserves and public transport access.
Choose Connells Point if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Hurstville for households prioritising schools.