Conondale vs Reesville, QLD suburb comparison

Conondale for schools; Reesville for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConondaleReesville

Overall score

Conondale

34.6/100

Reesville

38.2/100

Crime rate

Conondale

7.7 / 1k

Reesville

8.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Conondale

0

Reesville

0

Population

Conondale

882

Reesville

573

Metric leadConondale 3Reesville 32 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConondaleReesville
Overall score34.6/10038.2/100
Housing (desirability)20.8/10048.7/100
Crime rate7.7 / 1k8.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves31
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Population882573
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/107/10

Comparison summary

Conondale reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Reesville is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Conondale pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, whereas Reesville is the better pick for housing affordability and overall desirability. Conondale generally means more approachable housing costs, while Reesville leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Choose Conondale if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Reesville for retirees and families.

Related comparisons