Conondale vs Reesville, QLD Suburb Comparison

Conondale for retirees and families; Reesville for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConondaleReesville

Overall score

Conondale

47.7/100

Reesville

49.9/100

Crime rate

Conondale

13.3 / 1k

Reesville

13.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Conondale

7

Reesville

1

Population

Conondale

882

Reesville

573

Metric leadConondale 5Reesville 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConondaleReesville
Overall score47.7/10049.9/100
Housing (desirability)44.1/10056.5/100
Crime rate13.3 / 1k13.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves31
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities71
Green cover3.5%0.6%
Population882573
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/107/10

Comparison summary

Conondale reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Reesville is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Conondale pulls ahead on parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, whereas Reesville is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability. Conondale generally means more approachable housing costs, while Reesville leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Choose Conondale if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Reesville for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons