Kenilworth vs Reesville, QLD Suburb Comparison

Kenilworth for retirees and families; Reesville for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KenilworthReesville

Overall score

Kenilworth

48.6/100

Reesville

49.9/100

Crime rate

Kenilworth

14.3 / 1k

Reesville

13.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kenilworth

12

Reesville

1

Population

Kenilworth

604

Reesville

573

Metric leadKenilworth 5Reesville 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKenilworthReesville
Overall score48.6/10049.9/100
Housing (desirability)65.5/10056.5/100
Crime rate14.3 / 1k13.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves81
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities121
Green cover3.9%0.6%
Population604573
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/107/10

Comparison summary

Kenilworth is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Reesville is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Kenilworth tends to lead on parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, while Reesville stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Kenilworth generally means more approachable housing costs, while Reesville leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Kenilworth suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Reesville is the stronger match for retirees, families, and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons