Conondale vs Kenilworth, QLD Suburb Comparison

Conondale for investment; Kenilworth for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConondaleKenilworth

Overall score

Conondale

47.7/100

Kenilworth

48.6/100

Crime rate

Conondale

13.3 / 1k

Kenilworth

14.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Conondale

7

Kenilworth

12

Population

Conondale

882

Kenilworth

604

Metric leadConondale 2Kenilworth 54 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConondaleKenilworth
Overall score47.7/10048.6/100
Housing (desirability)44.1/10065.5/100
Crime rate13.3 / 1k14.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves38
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities712
Green cover3.5%3.9%
Population882604
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/103/10

Comparison summary

Conondale reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Kenilworth is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Conondale is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community; Kenilworth answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kenilworth, while Conondale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons