Overall score
Kenilworth
48.6/100
Witta
49.8/100
Kenilworth vs Witta, QLD Suburb Comparison
Kenilworth for retirees; Witta for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
KenilworthWitta
Crime rate
Kenilworth
14.3 / 1k
Witta
14.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kenilworth
12
Witta
10
Population
Kenilworth
604
Witta
1,296
Metric leadKenilworth 4Witta 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesKenilworth
- Best for investmentWitta
- Best for best valueWitta
- Best for best schoolsWitta
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kenilworth | Witta |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.6/100 | 49.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.5/100 | 55.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 14.3 / 1k | 14.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 12 | 10 |
| Green cover | 3.9% | 0.6% |
| Population | 604 | 1,296 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Kenilworth reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Witta is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Kenilworth tends to lead on parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, while Witta stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability. On housing, Kenilworth sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Witta.
On balance, investors and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Witta, while Kenilworth remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.