Coombs vs Duffy, ACT Suburb Comparison

Coombs for retirees; Duffy for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CoombsDuffy

Overall score

Coombs

48.0/100

Duffy

60.7/100

Crime rate

Coombs

12.6 / 1k

Duffy

12.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coombs

135

Duffy

107

Population

Coombs

4,851

Duffy

3,395

Metric leadCoombs 4Duffy 44 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoombsDuffy
Overall score48.0/10060.7/100
Housing (desirability)49.4/10062.6/100
Crime rate12.6 / 1k12.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves11
Walkability24.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities135107
Planning activity14
Green cover18.5%18.0%
Population4,8513,395
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Coombs is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Duffy is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Coombs sits closer to the city centre, whereas Duffy is in a middle-ring position.

Coombs tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, a calmer planning outlook, and a larger local community, while Duffy stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Duffy, while Coombs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons