Overall score
Coombs
55.7/100
Denman Prospect
62.9/100
Coombs for retirees and families; Denman Prospect for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coombs
55.7/100
Denman Prospect
62.9/100
Crime rate
Coombs
12.6 / 1k
Denman Prospect
8.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coombs
131
Denman Prospect
428
Population
Coombs
4,851
Denman Prospect
2,759
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coombs | Denman Prospect |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.7/100 | 62.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.1/100 | 42.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 12.6 / 1k | 8.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 131 | 428 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 17 |
| Population | 4,851 | 2,759 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Coombs is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Denman Prospect is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Coombs pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Denman Prospect is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
Retirees and families may find Coombs the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Denman Prospect.