Overall score
Coombs
48.0/100
Denman Prospect
56.1/100
Coombs vs Denman Prospect, ACT Suburb Comparison
Denman Prospect for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CoombsDenman Prospect
Crime rate
Coombs
12.6 / 1k
Denman Prospect
8.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coombs
135
Denman Prospect
454
Population
Coombs
4,851
Denman Prospect
2,759
Metric leadCoombs 5Denman Prospect 43 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesDenman Prospect
- Best for familiesDenman Prospect
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coombs | Denman Prospect |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.0/100 | 56.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.4/100 | 45.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 12.6 / 1k | 8.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 135 | 454 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 19 |
| Green cover | 18.5% | 13.2% |
| Population | 4,851 | 2,759 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Coombs is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Denman Prospect is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Coombs pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Denman Prospect is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Coombs the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Denman Prospect.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.