Coombs vs Phillip, ACT Suburb Comparison

Coombs for value; Phillip for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CoombsPhillip

Overall score

Coombs

48.0/100

Phillip

61.0/100

Crime rate

Coombs

12.6 / 1k

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coombs

135

Phillip

933

Population

Coombs

4,851

Phillip

5,197

Metric leadCoombs 3Phillip 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoombsPhillip
Overall score48.0/10061.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.4/10056.0/100
Crime rate12.6 / 1k70.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools411
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves13
Walkability24.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities135933
Planning activity112
Green cover18.5%12.4%
Population4,8515,197
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Coombs is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Coombs is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Phillip answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability.

Choose Coombs if you are weighing retirees, families, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Phillip for investors and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons