Overall score
Coombs
48.0/100
Phillip
61.0/100
Coombs for value; Phillip for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coombs
48.0/100
Phillip
61.0/100
Crime rate
Coombs
12.6 / 1k
Phillip
70.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coombs
135
Phillip
933
Population
Coombs
4,851
Phillip
5,197
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coombs | Phillip |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.0/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.4/100 | 56.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 12.6 / 1k | 70.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 11 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 135 | 933 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 12 |
| Green cover | 18.5% | 12.4% |
| Population | 4,851 | 5,197 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Coombs is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Coombs is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Phillip answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability.
Choose Coombs if you are weighing retirees, families, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Phillip for investors and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.