Coombs vs Phillip, ACT suburb comparison

Coombs for retirees and families; Phillip for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CoombsPhillip

Overall score

Coombs

55.7/100

Phillip

67.1/100

Crime rate

Coombs

12.6 / 1k

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coombs

131

Phillip

913

Population

Coombs

4,851

Phillip

5,197

Metric leadCoombs 3Phillip 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoombsPhillip
Overall score55.7/10067.1/100
Housing (desirability)50.1/10019.4/100
Crime rate12.6 / 1k70.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools411
Parks & reserves13
Walkability24.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities131913
Planning activity110
Population4,8515,197
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Coombs is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Coombs is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Phillip answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.

Choose Coombs if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Phillip for investors and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons