Overall score
Cowan
48.8/100
Fiddletown
54.0/100
Cowan vs Fiddletown, NSW Suburb Comparison
Cowan for families; Fiddletown for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CowanFiddletown
Crime rate
Cowan
34.9 / 1k
Fiddletown
15.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cowan
3
Fiddletown
5
Population
Cowan
631
Fiddletown
259
Metric leadCowan 6Fiddletown 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesCowan
- Best for investmentFiddletown
- Best for best schoolsFiddletown
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cowan | Fiddletown |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.8/100 | 54.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.6/100 | 47.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.9 / 1k | 15.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 4 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 2 |
| Green cover | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Population | 631 | 259 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Cowan reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Fiddletown is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Cowan sits among greener hillside streets, while Fiddletown keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Cowan tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, while Fiddletown stands out for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Cowan suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Fiddletown is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.