Overall score
Cowan
35.3/100
Fiddletown
34.9/100
Cowan for investment and value; Fiddletown for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cowan
35.3/100
Fiddletown
34.9/100
Crime rate
Cowan
34.9 / 1k
Fiddletown
15.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cowan
1
Fiddletown
0
Population
Cowan
631
Fiddletown
259
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cowan | Fiddletown |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.3/100 | 34.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.2/100 | 44.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.9 / 1k | 15.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 4 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 2 |
| Population | 631 | 259 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Cowan reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Fiddletown is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Cowan sits among greener hillside streets, while Fiddletown keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Cowan tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Fiddletown stands out for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Cowan suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Fiddletown is the stronger match for retirees and families.