Overall score
Robina
58.5/100
Craigieburn
44.3/100
Robina vs Craigieburn Suburb Comparison (QLD vs VIC)
Robina for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
RobinaCraigieburn
Crime rate
Robina
42.8 / 1k
Craigieburn
58.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Robina
518
Craigieburn
928
Population
Robina
25,659
Craigieburn
65,178
Metric leadRobina 5Craigieburn 61 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Robina | Craigieburn |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.5/100 | 44.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.6/100 | 41.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.8 / 1k | 58.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 112 | 73 |
| Public transport stops | 92 | 231 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 518 | 928 |
| Planning activity | — | 190 |
| Green cover | 10.1% | 11.4% |
| Population | 25,659 | 65,178 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Robina (QLD) is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Craigieburn (VIC) is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Robina is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and overall desirability; Craigieburn answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access. On housing, Robina sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Craigieburn.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Robina, while Craigieburn remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.